<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slides from 360&#124;MAX Presentation (Cairngorm + ZendAMF)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.garthdb.com/2008/11/slides-from-360max-presentation-cairngorm-zendamf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.garthdb.com/2008/11/slides-from-360max-presentation-cairngorm-zendamf/</link>
	<description>Development, Design, or Something Else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:15:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GarthDB</title>
		<link>http://blog.garthdb.com/2008/11/slides-from-360max-presentation-cairngorm-zendamf/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>GarthDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.garthdb.com/?p=200#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;ve looked at PureMVC a lot more lately.  I have been telling people to get into Cairngorm as their first micro architecture as it is used by Adobe Consulting and is universally more used in enterprise settings.  SilvaFUG did a comparison and found PureMVC overall better, but that you should still learn Cairngorm - &lt;a href=&quot;http://puremvc.org/content/view/43/98/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://puremvc.org/content/view/43/98/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll have to look into the Prana project.  Sounds really interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#39;ve looked at PureMVC a lot more lately.  I have been telling people to get into Cairngorm as their first micro architecture as it is used by Adobe Consulting and is universally more used in enterprise settings.  SilvaFUG did a comparison and found PureMVC overall better, but that you should still learn Cairngorm &#8211; <a href="http://puremvc.org/content/view/43/98/" rel="nofollow">http://puremvc.org/content/view/43/98/</a><br />I&#39;ll have to look into the Prana project.  Sounds really interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gardner</title>
		<link>http://blog.garthdb.com/2008/11/slides-from-360max-presentation-cairngorm-zendamf/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.garthdb.com/?p=200#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at PureMVC at all? I&#039;ve found PureMVC is a much nicer architecture than Cairngorm - in particlar Cairngorm has some architectural hacks that kind of violate basic software principles (i.e. they use their singletons like gigantic global variable pits, and then end up tightly coupling everything to your model locator) - PureMVC isn&#039;t perfect either, but it&#039;s a lot nicer in my experience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You might also want to take a peek at the Prana project - which is basically a port of Java&#039;s Spring Framework to Actionscript (I heard a rumor that it will soon be picked up as an official Spring Source project - which will be a big deal) - but what it does is it gives you a nice XML file you can use to configure and wire together all of your objects - which makes certain use cases like swapping in delegates that serve static data for quick serverless testing or having it use real delegats - as simple as tweaking a few lines in the XML file and the complied swf doesn&#039;t care either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at PureMVC at all? I&#39;ve found PureMVC is a much nicer architecture than Cairngorm &#8211; in particlar Cairngorm has some architectural hacks that kind of violate basic software principles (i.e. they use their singletons like gigantic global variable pits, and then end up tightly coupling everything to your model locator) &#8211; PureMVC isn&#39;t perfect either, but it&#39;s a lot nicer in my experience. </p>
<p>You might also want to take a peek at the Prana project &#8211; which is basically a port of Java&#39;s Spring Framework to Actionscript (I heard a rumor that it will soon be picked up as an official Spring Source project &#8211; which will be a big deal) &#8211; but what it does is it gives you a nice XML file you can use to configure and wire together all of your objects &#8211; which makes certain use cases like swapping in delegates that serve static data for quick serverless testing or having it use real delegats &#8211; as simple as tweaking a few lines in the XML file and the complied swf doesn&#39;t care either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarthDB &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cairngorm and Zend AMF [360&#124;MAX]</title>
		<link>http://blog.garthdb.com/2008/11/slides-from-360max-presentation-cairngorm-zendamf/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>GarthDB &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cairngorm and Zend AMF [360&#124;MAX]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.garthdb.com/?p=200#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: The presentation went well. Thanks 360&#124;Conferences, Wade Arnold, and those who showed up. You can can find the slides here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: The presentation went well. Thanks 360|Conferences, Wade Arnold, and those who showed up. You can can find the slides here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarthDB</title>
		<link>http://blog.garthdb.com/2008/11/slides-from-360max-presentation-cairngorm-zendamf/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>GarthDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.garthdb.com/?p=200#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;ve looked at PureMVC a lot more lately.  I have been telling people to get into Cairngorm as their first micro architecture as it is used by Adobe Consulting and is universally more used in enterprise settings.  SilvaFUG did a comparison and found PureMVC overall better, but that you should still learn Cairngorm - &lt;a href=&quot;http://puremvc.org/content/view/43/98/&quot;&gt;http://puremvc.org/content/view/43/98/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll have to look into the Prana project.  Sounds really interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#39;ve looked at PureMVC a lot more lately.  I have been telling people to get into Cairngorm as their first micro architecture as it is used by Adobe Consulting and is universally more used in enterprise settings.  SilvaFUG did a comparison and found PureMVC overall better, but that you should still learn Cairngorm &#8211; <a href="http://puremvc.org/content/view/43/98/">http://puremvc.org/content/view/43/98/</a><br />I&#39;ll have to look into the Prana project.  Sounds really interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gardner</title>
		<link>http://blog.garthdb.com/2008/11/slides-from-360max-presentation-cairngorm-zendamf/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.garthdb.com/?p=200#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at PureMVC at all? I&#039;ve found PureMVC is a much nicer architecture than Cairngorm - in particlar Cairngorm has some architectural hacks that kind of violate basic software principles (i.e. they use their singletons like gigantic global variable pits, and then end up tightly coupling everything to your model locator) - PureMVC isn&#039;t perfect either, but it&#039;s a lot nicer in my experience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You might also want to take a peek at the Prana project - which is basically a port of Java&#039;s Spring Framework to Actionscript (I heard a rumor that it will soon be picked up as an official Spring Source project - which will be a big deal) - but what it does is it gives you a nice XML file you can use to configure and wire together all of your objects - which makes certain use cases like swapping in delegates that serve static data for quick serverless testing or having it use real delegats - as simple as tweaking a few lines in the XML file and the complied swf doesn&#039;t care either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at PureMVC at all? I&#39;ve found PureMVC is a much nicer architecture than Cairngorm &#8211; in particlar Cairngorm has some architectural hacks that kind of violate basic software principles (i.e. they use their singletons like gigantic global variable pits, and then end up tightly coupling everything to your model locator) &#8211; PureMVC isn&#39;t perfect either, but it&#39;s a lot nicer in my experience. </p>
<p>You might also want to take a peek at the Prana project &#8211; which is basically a port of Java&#39;s Spring Framework to Actionscript (I heard a rumor that it will soon be picked up as an official Spring Source project &#8211; which will be a big deal) &#8211; but what it does is it gives you a nice XML file you can use to configure and wire together all of your objects &#8211; which makes certain use cases like swapping in delegates that serve static data for quick serverless testing or having it use real delegats &#8211; as simple as tweaking a few lines in the XML file and the complied swf doesn&#39;t care either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
